首页> 外文OA文献 >An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects
【2h】

An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects

机译:基于AHP(层次分析法)/ ANP(网络分析法)的多准则决策方法,用于选择太阳能热电厂投资项目

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and the ANP (Analytic Network Process) are applied to help the managing board of an important Spanish solar power investment company to decide whether to invest in a particular solar-thermal power plant project and, if so, to determine the order of priority of the projects in the company's portfolio.Project management goes through a long process, from obtaining the required construction permits and authorizations, negotiating with different stakeholders, complying with complex legal regulations, to solving the technical problems associated with plant construction and distribution of the energy generated. The whole process involves high engineering costs.The decision approach proposed in this paper consists of three phases. In the first two phases, the managing board must decide whether to accept or reject a project according to a set of criteria previously identified by the technical team. The third phase consists of establishing a priority order among the projects that have proven to be economically profitable based on project risk levels and execution time delays.This work analyzes the criteria that should be taken into account to accept or reject proposals for investment, as well as the risks used to prioritize some projects over others. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
机译:本文采用AHP(层次分析法)和ANP(网络分析法)来帮助一家重要的西班牙太阳能投资公司的董事会决定是否投资某个特定的太阳能热电厂项目,以及是否因此,要确定项目在公司投资组合中的优先顺序。项目管理需要一个漫长的过程,从获得所需的施工许可和授权,与不同的利益相关者进行谈判,遵守复杂的法律法规,到解决相关的技术问题。随着工厂建设和分配产生的能量。整个过程涉及高昂的工程造价。本文提出的决策方法包括三个阶段。在前两个阶段中,管理委员会必须根据技术团队先前确定的一组标准来决定是接受还是拒绝项目。第三阶段包括根据项目风险水平和执行时间延迟在已被证明具有经济效益的项目之间建立优先顺序,这项工作分析了接受或拒绝投资建议时应考虑的标准作为将某些项目优先于其他项目的风险。 ©2013爱思唯尔有限公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号